Site icon Christopher Watkin

Epidemics are apocalyptic, but not in the way we might think. Let’s read Camus’ La Peste #1

This is my first post about Albert Camus’s La Peste (The Plague). I’m about a quarter of the way through the novel now, and there’s SO MUCH to write about.

More on all of those points in future posts. For now, however, I want to focus on an “apocalyptic tone” struck in relation to current events.

No doubt murmurs of the end of the world will circulate on social media over coming weeks, with both religious and secular prophets showing us how the world will end or be changed dramatically and forever. Before we dismiss all apocalyptic talk as scare-mongering nonsense, let’s take another look at the central term in question. The Greek ἀποκάλυψις literally means “uncovering” or “revelation”, and taken in this sense a pandemic is truly an apocalyptic event: it strips away some of the varnish of convention and comfort that lacquers our normal lives, revealing instincts—both noble and base—that usually hide behind veils of propriety.

Camus understands this, and sets his reader’s expectations in the opening pages of La Peste, before any mention of the plague itself:

Une manière commode de faire la connaissance d’une ville est de chercher comment on y travaille, comment on y aime et comment on y meurt. (13-14)[1]

A convenient way of making a town’s acquaintance is to ascertain how the people in it work, how they love, and how they die.

Death is apocalyptic; it shows who we are. The threat of death, even abstract and intangible, not only reveals us to others, but also to ourselves. It challenges our umbilical attachment to modes of identity formation that rely on our customary roles and self-image (I am a professional; I am a sportsperson; I am in control), and it requires us to fall back on the only identity marker that the virus respects: we are human beings. This is truly apocalyptic.

 

[1] The following edition was used: Albert Camus, La Peste (Paris: Gallimard, 1955).

Exit mobile version