Atheism

  • Which God(s) do you (not) believe in? An interview with Christopher Watkin, Journal of Baudrillard Studies

    Which God(s) do you (not) believe in? An interview with Christopher Watkin, Journal of Baudrillard Studies

    A while back now I was interviewed by Jon Baldwin for the International Journal of Baudrillard Studies. The original electronic version of the interview is available here. I have also also pasted it below.   Which God(s) do you (not) believe in? An interview with Christopher Watkin ISSN: 1705-6411 Volume 16, Number 1 (January 2020)

    Read Post →

  • What is a theological concept? Part 4: Jean-Luc Nancy’s “something in Christianity deeper than Christianity”

    What is a theological concept? Part 4: Jean-Luc Nancy’s “something in Christianity deeper than Christianity”

    In the previous post I explored Nancy’s reading of Badiou’s interruption of the mytheme by the matheme as a theological moment in Badiou’s thought. But what about Nancy himself? Does his own atheism—for atheist he indeed professes to be, providing that atheism is understood in a way that avoids the Christmas projection—avoid theological concepts? In

    Read Post →

  • What is a theological concept? Part 3: Alain Badiou’s interruption of the mytheme by the matheme and Jean-Luc Nancy’s “Christmas Projection”

    What is a theological concept? Part 3: Alain Badiou’s interruption of the mytheme by the matheme and Jean-Luc Nancy’s “Christmas Projection”

    In this third post in the “what is a theological concept?” series I focus for the first time on a specific philosophical moment: Alain Badiou’s account of the interruption of the mytheme by the matheme. I am particularly interested in Jean-Luc Nancy’s reading of this Badiouian move, for Nancy sees in the interruption of the

    Read Post →

  • Difficult Atheism reviewed in Derrida Today

    Difficult Atheism reviewed in Derrida Today

    The latest issue of Derrida Today includes a review of my Difficult Atheism by Christina Smerick. You can read the whole review online for free here. Watkin’s thesis is bold and unapologetic, and shapes the path of his reading and thinking with intense focus. His main concern, bordering on a battle cry, is that the ground gained by atheism

    Read Post →

  • Talk in Melbourne on Aug 5 – Varieties of Contemporary Atheism: Badiou, Nancy, Meillassoux

    On August 5 at 11am I will have the pleasure of speaking at the Melbourne University of Divinity philosophy seminar on the subject “Varieties of Contemporary Atheism: Badiou, Nancy, Meillassoux”. The talk seeks to synthesise and develop some of the main lines of thinking from Difficult Atheism and to open the argument of the book to

    Read Post →

  • Third Derrida Podcast: Derrida, Atheism and Theology

    The third of the podcasts on Derrida and Reformed theology has now been released. The first considered questions of metaphysics and the second focused on Derrida’s ethics; this final podcast discusses Derrida’s engagement with theological themes. I begin by discussing Derrida’s cautious affirmation that “I rightly pass for an atheist”, and try to dismantle the myth that, for

    Read Post →

  • Bookending the crisis of modernity: Latour is finishing what Nietzsche mistakenly started

    I’m currently writing the final chapter of The Human Remains, addressing Bruno Latour’s modes of existence project and work on Gaia in relation to Serres, Malabou, Meillassoux and Badiou’s accounts of the human. It’s all hands to the pump and there is little time to expatiate on this blog, but I couldn’t resist quickly drawing attention to

    Read Post →

  • New review of Difficult Atheism at Marx and Philosophy

    New review of Difficult Atheism at Marx and Philosophy

    Over at Marx&Philosophy, Bryan Cooke (whom I had the pleasure of meeting at last year’s Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy conference) has posted a review of Difficult Atheism. The opening paragraph gives a flavour of the review’s tone and also of Bryan’s style, which, for all the right reasons, is best left undescribed: Christopher Watkin’s

    Read Post →

  • My review of Hollis Phelps Alain Badiou Between Theology and Anti-Theology published in French Studies

    My review of Hollis Phelps’ Alain Badiou: Between Theology and Anti-Theology has just been published in French Studies. It is available in fulltext and PDF.    

    Read Post →

  • Of ornitheology

    How do we decide if a particular philosophy is covertly theological? One all-too-common response to this question boils down to little more than a theological bird-watching expedition in which we don our binoculars, pick up our guide books and descend upon an unsuspecting article or book in the hope of catching sight of a Lesser Spotted Miracle

    Read Post →

  • Meillassoux’s Oedipal atheism

    ‘No gods anywhere now, not for me, now’: Meillassoux’s Oedipal atheism In Difficult Atheism I left the discussion of Meillassoux’s divine inexistence after having sketched a series of arguments detailing why I think he does not succeed in demonstrating the principle of factiality in the way I think he intends. In this post I want

    Read Post →

  • Paul Ricoeur in Dialogue with Theology and Religious Studies

    In September I will have the great pleasure of taking part in a symposium at the University of Lund, Sweden, entitled “Paul Ricœur in Dialogue with Theology and Religious Studies.” In addition to looking forward to hearing what is set to be a fantastic array of papers, I hope to be able to contribute something to

    Read Post →

  • Quentin Meillassoux, divine inexistence and split rationality

    With a new issue of Analecta Hermeneutica just out there has been some discussion this past week of Peter Gratton’s article on Meillassoux’s ontology of divine inexistence (here, here and here, with some reaction on Gratton’s own blog, Philosophy in a time of error). The discussion put me in mind of a paper I gave way

    Read Post →